Evidence interface

See how accountable intelligence should behave.

Explore the interaction model: source-aware answers, inspectable provenance, explicit uncertainty and a visible evidence boundary. The scenarios are illustrative and do not resolve live regulatory or firm data.

INTERFACE DEMONSTRATION · Static scenarios are specimens, not legal advice, live FCA content, or cryptographic proof. A connected response is certified only when its AVE token and ledger chain resolve.

1 · The question

A probate matter missed the CGT reporting deadline. What is my client-duty exposure and the penalty position?

2 · Specimen response — verify every source

Illustrative response, not legal advice. The interface can place a recorded filing-penalty excerpt from

beside a recorded professional-duty excerpt from .

⤷ Both halves answered in one pass — HMRC penalty text and the conduct provision, each resolving to a source node.

3 · Governance format — specimen until resolved

The static events below illustrate the intended format. They are not live ledger events or signatures.

  1. specimen-01Example query eventnot live
  2. specimen-02Example retrieval eventnot live
  3. specimen-03Example proof boundarynot signed
—No current corpus claim
2Specimen citations
3Specimen events
—No live response
Specimen mode · no backend or proof has been resolved
— No public performance metric Internal research results are not product evidence
— No deployed evaluation No live study or same-job result is represented
— No current serving snapshot State Authority Lock controls current corpus state
— No product configuration claim Candidate controls require independent proof
Where this sits

Generic chat. Aprentiz. Manual research.

Generic AI chat Aprentiz Manual research
Accuracy Varies by model, retrieval and controls Required to ground or preserve an incomplete state Depends on source selection and reviewer judgement
Auditability Implementation-dependent AVE token and verified chain required for machine certification Depends on the firm’s documented process
Speed Workload-dependent Measured per deployment; no public SLA claimed Matter and reviewer-dependent
Regulatory defensibility Depends on data, source and governance controls Evidence support only; not a compliance determination Depends on competent review and retained evidence
The compounding system

Intelligence that can improve without losing accountability.

Institutional knowledge depth

Provenance-bearing memory is designed to preserve useful organisational context while keeping validation, retention and operating boundaries explicit.

From retrieval to cognition

LoRA-based domain adaptation is an AIRR research track. It is not generally available and no customer-owned weight or performance outcome is promised.

Time is the non-fungible input

Any compounding advantage must be demonstrated with longitudinal customer evidence. No 24-month result or competitor-impossibility claim is made.

“A roadmap is not evidence until its gate passes.”
Work with Aprentiz → Explore the architecture →

Static scenarios are illustrative and may not reflect current law. Verify official sources and firm applicability. No FCA endorsement, legal advice or compliance guarantee.